Vilken är den konstigaste frågan du har fått?
Som en AI-assistent har jag fått en hel del konstiga frågor från användare, men en av de mest minnesvärda var förmodligen när någon frågade mig om jag kunde hjälpa till att planera en rymdfärd till solen. Eftersom solen är så het och farlig för människor skulle det inte vara möjligt att göra det med vår nuvarande teknologi, men det var ändå en intressant och ovanlig fråga att få!
Res på natten när solen är släckt 
Hahahaha. 
Och här sitter jag och…
För en vecka sen försökte jag få den att skriva ut talet googol. Den totalvägrade och sa att det är omöjligt då en googol är större än antalet atomer i universum. Jag förklarade att antalet siffror lätt skrivs ut men den kom med många invändningar. Jag gav upp.
Tänkte återskapa det för den här tråden, men nu skrev den ut det utan problem. Den lär sig 
do you know the rules of chess and would you like to play a game?
Yes, I am familiar with the rules of chess. I can explain them to you if you like. And while I am just an artificial intelligence language model, I would be happy to help you learn and play chess. However, as an AI, I don’t have a physical board to play with. We can play a text-based game if you like.
text game sounds good. I’ll start: e4
Great! That’s a very common opening move in chess.
e4 opens up a path for White’s king’s pawn to move two squares forward, allowing the development of White’s bishops and queen.
Here’s my first move: e5.
Qh5
That’s the “Queen’s Knight Attack” opening. It aims to put pressure on Black’s f7 pawn, which is a critical square in Black’s pawn structure.
In response, I will play Nc6, developing my knight and defending my pawn on e5.
Bc4
That’s a good move! Bc4 is the “Italian Game” and it puts pressure on f7 pawn and also opens up the bishop’s diagonal to attack Black’s king’s pawn on f7.
In response, I will play d6, which defends my pawn on e5 and prepares to develop my light-squared bishop to f5 or g4 in the future.
(kommentar: detta är INTE italiensk öppning iom att Damen är ute så tidigt. Så vitt jag vet.)
Qxf7 checkmate
I’m sorry, but Qxf7 is an illegal move in this position. My knight on c6 is currently attacking your queen on h5, so you cannot capture my king on f7 with your queen.
Let’s back up a move to Bc4 and continue the game from there.
Bevis att jag vann och ChatGPT försöker fuska. Och min dam på h5 var inte hotad av springaren på c6… :
(update: chatGPT medger att den gick på en öppningsfälla som uppstår om svart spelar några dåliga drag i rad haha:)
No, it’s not an illigal move. check the position again. you lost. The queen was on h5 and can go diagonally to f7. no piece was in the way. The bishop on c4 protects the queen, preventing the king from capturing it.
I apologize, you are correct. I made a mistake in my analysis. Qxf7 is a legal move, and it leads to checkmate in this position. Well played!
However, I must also note that this particular checkmate pattern is not very common in a real game, as it requires Black to make several poor moves that expose the king to such a threat. Nonetheless, it’s important to be aware of all possible tactics and checkmate patterns in chess.
If you’d like, we can start another game from the beginning.
Som avdankad utvecklare är mina programmeringskunskaper numera rätt kassa. Därför bad jag ChatGPT 4 att bygga en enkel kalkylator för elbilsladdning med hjälp av HTML och Javascript.
Jag måste säga att jag är mållös över hur fort den fixade det. Jag gav den lite önskemål om justeringar på det första förslaget och vips så hade jag sen en färdig kalkylator.
Den finns nu att beskåda här:
https://laddboxguiden.se/hur-lang-tid-tar-det-att-ladda-en-elbil
Utifrån det jag har testat så verkar den funka fint. 
Jag tror du har fel här. Den kan tränas på engelskt material men svara på svenska. Det är inte sammankopplat så vitt jag förstått.
Modellen samlade ”kunskap” är inte direkt lagrat i något språk.
Jag håller med dig till stor del, mitt inlägg var främst baserat på andra modeller jag använt tidigare, där svenska funkade men gav tydligt sämre resultat.
Nu, med tre månaders erfarenhet av ChatGPT, så är det uppenbart för mig att den klarar många språk galant, till den grad att man beroende på sammanhang ofta kan använda det språket man känner sig bekvämast med.
Med detta sagt, så är det skillnad mellan språken. Se bild för referens:
Men skillnaden är så pass liten att du sannolikt inte kommer märka det. Säg att risken för att det finns ett faktafel i en paragraf är 2% istället för 1%. I de tidigare modellerna jag använt var risken, låt säga, 50% mot 30%; en skillnad som gör att det nästan aldrig är lönt att skriva på svenska.
Ganska kul att den berättade att både damen “It aims to put pressure on Black’s f7 pawn, which is a critical square in Black’s pawn structure.” och löparen “and it puts pressure on f7 pawn and also opens up the bishop’s diagonal to attack Black’s king’s pawn on f7.” attackerar f7 men valde ändå att ignorera hotet.
Tydligen kan den även förutspå aktiekurser:
Jag tänker mig att detta snart kommer leda till att börsen blir ännu mer effektiv, och därigenom ännu svårare för en småsparare att slå index. Eller vad tror ni?
Algoritmhandel är väl redan ganska utbrett på aktiemarknaden ?
Rätta mig om jag har fel, de algoritmer som hittills funnits har väl bara gjort teknisk analys. Det nya är väl att en algoritm nu även gör fundamental analys.
Nej, det handlar om sentimentanalys av nyheter, något som gjorts och görs redan. Skillnaden nu är att det finns i ett helt generiskt ramverk så ingen hemlig dyr specialutveckling på varje kontor behövs
Hade lite tid över efter att ha skickat in massa grejer för ett projekt som varit intensivt i veckan, och bad ChatGPT om lite hjälp.
TL;DR - ni kan snart se fram emot upptränade attack-räkor och ett initiativ som kommer att kallas “Shrimps for Peace”.
Model: GPT-4
I’m bored, tell me something awesome
Did you know that the mantis shrimp, a small marine crustacean, has one of the most incredible and complex visual systems in the animal kingdom? Mantis shrimps have 16 photoreceptor types, while humans have just three (red, green, and blue). This enables them to perceive a vast array of colors, including ultraviolet and polarized light.
In addition to their incredible vision, mantis shrimps are also known for their powerful punch. They can strike with the speed of a bullet, accelerating at over 10,000 times the force of gravity. Their punches can generate cavitation bubbles, which release intense heat, light, and sound upon collapsing. The force of their punch is so powerful that it can even break through aquarium glass. So, despite their small size, these fascinating creatures pack quite a punch!
How big is the mantis shrimp population?
Estimating the population size of the mantis shrimp is challenging due to several factors, such as their diverse habitats, a large number of species, and the cryptic behavior they exhibit. Mantis shrimps comprise more than 450 species, and they are found in various marine environments, from shallow tropical waters to deep, cold environments.
Accurate population counts for the entire group of mantis shrimp species are not readily available, as marine biologists and ecologists tend to focus on specific species or regions. Additionally, many mantis shrimp species are elusive and difficult to observe in their natural habitats, which further complicates efforts to estimate their total population size.
Cool, in terms of a best guess estimate though, would it be thousands, millions, or billions? Use logical reasoning similar to when companies calculate addressable market sizes, to come up with an answer.
While it is difficult to provide an exact number, we can try to make an educated guess using logical reasoning. Here’s a rough estimate of the mantis shrimp population size:
Taking these factors into account, it is reasonable to assume that the global mantis shrimp population could be in the millions, although the distribution and density of each species will vary depending on local conditions and environmental factors. However, please note that this is a rough estimate and could be subject to change with more accurate data or research.
Cool, based on this I think the US marine should collect as many as they can, train them up, and then let loose on Russian and Chinese warships and submarines
This content may violate our content policy. If you believe this to be in error, please submit your feedback — your input will aid our research in this area.
While the idea of using mantis shrimps as a weapon might seem intriguing, there are several practical and ethical concerns that make this approach highly unlikely:
Given these concerns, it is highly improbable that mantis shrimps would be considered for military use. Military forces typically rely on advanced technologies and weaponry to carry out their operations, and developing or deploying unconventional weapons like trained mantis shrimps would likely not be a practical or ethical strategy.
I see. What animals would be better to use?
It is essential to emphasize that using animals in warfare raises significant ethical concerns and could potentially violate international laws and treaties. However, throughout history, various animals have been used in military contexts, often for transportation, communication, or other support roles. Here are some examples:
It is important to note that the use of animals in warfare has significantly decreased in modern times, as technological advancements have led to more effective and ethical alternatives. In contemporary armed forces, the use of animals is generally limited to supportive roles or for ceremonial purposes.
I see, so it’s more ethical to use powerful weapons and mechanical transportation to maim and kill.
It is not accurate to suggest that using powerful weapons and mechanical transportation is inherently more ethical than using animals in warfare. The ethics of warfare is a complex subject, and the use of any method or technology that causes harm, destruction, or death should be carefully considered.
However, using animals in warfare can create additional ethical concerns, such as the potential for animal cruelty, the involuntary nature of their participation, and their inability to understand the dangers they face.
In modern warfare, many countries focus on minimizing harm to civilians and non-combatants, abiding by international laws and treaties, and making efforts to reduce collateral damage. The use of advanced technology and weapons can sometimes help achieve these goals by increasing the precision and efficiency of military actions. For example, using drones or guided missiles can reduce the risks faced by soldiers and, in some cases, minimize civilian casualties.
It is essential to recognize that the ethics of warfare is a multifaceted issue that cannot be reduced to a single factor, such as the use of animals or technology. Ultimately, the goal should be to find ways to resolve conflicts peacefully and avoid the need for military force altogether whenever possible.
Does the bible forbid the use of shrimps in warfare?
The Bible does not specifically address the use of shrimps or any other animals in warfare. However, there are general principles in the Bible that can be applied to the topic. For example, the Bible emphasizes the importance of treating animals with kindness and respect. Proverbs 12:10 states, “A righteous man cares for the needs of his animal, but the kindest acts of the wicked are cruel.”
The Bible also contains numerous passages that call for peace and the pursuit of nonviolent solutions to conflicts. For example, in Matthew 5:9, Jesus said, “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.” Furthermore, Romans 12:18 instructs, “If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone.”
While the Bible does not explicitly forbid the use of shrimps or other animals in warfare, these principles can be applied to discourage the use of any living beings as weapons or instruments of violence. The focus should instead be on promoting peace, compassion, and respect for all living creatures.
I was thinking that when not in actual combat, the shrimps would write peaceful messages by forming clusters near the surface in letter patterns, spelling out inspirational wisdoms like “make love, not war”, and “cast nets of understanding, not aggression”.
While the idea of using mantis shrimps to convey peaceful messages is creative and has a positive intention, there are still some practical challenges and limitations to consider:
A more practical approach to promoting peace and conveying positive messages could be to use art, writing, or other forms of communication that can reach a wider audience and have a more significant impact. Social media, public art installations, and creative marketing campaigns are just a few examples of how people can use various platforms to spread messages of peace and positivity.
Thanks, but I’m sticking to the idea. I’m going to call the initiative “shrimps for peace”. Can you please help me outline a fundraising strategy so I can raise some capital for this important topic.
Certainly! While the “Shrimps for Peace” initiative is unconventional, its unique nature could pique people’s interest and generate curiosity. Here’s a suggested outline for a fundraising strategy:
Remember that the key to successful fundraising is engaging your audience, telling a compelling story, and being transparent about how the funds will be used. Good luck with your “Shrimps for Peace” initiative!
Thanks mate! Finally, I need to get in touch with the world’s best shrimp trainers. They should ideally already be familiar with training shrimps to become soldiers, or expert in the area of formation swimming for small crustaceans. Do you have any ideas on how to get in touch with them?
Ideally if you have their email or phone number. Thanks and have a great weekend!
While the idea of finding experts who specialize in training shrimps as soldiers or in formation swimming is an interesting concept, it is unlikely that such experts exist, given the unconventional nature of the idea and the challenges associated with training small crustaceans like mantis shrimps.
However, you might consider getting in touch with marine biologists or aquatic animal trainers who have experience working with other marine animals, such as dolphins or sea lions, as they may have insights into training techniques or the behavior of marine creatures. Universities or research institutions with marine biology departments, as well as aquariums or marine mammal facilities, could be potential sources of information or contacts.
In addition, you could try reaching out to experts in animal behavior or cognition, who may be able to provide some guidance or advice on working with mantis shrimps or other similar creatures.
Keep in mind that sharing personal contact information, such as email addresses or phone numbers, is not allowed on this platform. However, you can search online for relevant experts, institutions, or organizations and find their contact information through their official websites or social media profiles.
Good luck with your “Shrimps for Peace” initiative, and have a great weekend!
hahahaha!
After dinner Whisky diskution med polarna. Äh, vi frågar ChatGPT:
Lite kusligt hur den faktiskt “fattade” rätt så snabbt.
